Tom Clarke, Employment Law & HR
The rate at which UK employer are adopting AI tools to automate and speed up day to day tasks is rapidly increasing and with ever increased coverage, AI implementation in the workplace is only going to increase. In addition, employment law changes under the new Employment Rights Act are also likely to see increased pressure on effective recruitment as business focus on making more effective hires and minimising the risks associated with dismissals. This article serves as a brief guide on using AI in recruitment, and as well as the potential risks to be aware of.
Changes to employment rights are also likely to see increased pressure on effective recruitment. This article serves as a brief guide on using AI in recruitment, and as well as the potential risks to be aware of.
CV scanning: At the initial application stage, employers may receive hundreds of CVs which are difficult to sift through quickly and effectively to ensure the best candidates are considered. AI tools can automate this initial recruitment stage to search for and prioritise CVs containing key words relevant to what the employer is looking for, for example, determining whether the candidate has the minimum qualifications required. Using this tool may help employers to minimise not only the time spent manually screening each candidate but also any human bias, provided it is used correctly.
Scheduling interviews / AI monitored video interviews: When it comes to interviewing candidates, many employers will choose to interview either face to face or via a video call. AI diary tools can help to schedule these interviews around existing schedules and in accordance with candidate availability.
Alternatively, some employers now choose to implement video interviews performed or assisted by AI. Using some AI software, the candidate records their response to a question within a time limit and AI can analyse and score this response.
Other forms of AI software can analyse tone of voice, language and facial expressions during live video interviews, compare the traits it identifies to specified job requirements, and then provide scores for each candidate. Although these can be useful tools, it is always advised that AI is not solely relied upon to score candidates in order to avoid bias.
Analysing candidate performance: Another potential use for AI is to rank candidates depending on how they have performed in certain set tests, or more generally at each stage in the recruitment process. This is particularly helpful at the final stages of the recruitment process to give a more objective overview of each candidate, reducing the risk of human bias.
Employee onboarding: AI also has potential use in the employee onboarding process. AI can direct new employees to appropriate resources if they need help finding their employer’s policies for example, and can keep a record of any training the employee has completed.
Although not a claim under English law, a major lawsuit was recent pursed in the US against the software giant Workday, which provides workplace HR software. The case centres on arguments that Workday’s AI-powered hiring tools were unintentionally discriminating about older applicants, exemplified by a claimant who had applied for multiple roles at the company and recent almost instant rejections. It is evident that courts are taking such claims seriously and are prepared to hold employers accountable even where discrimination is the result of automated decision-making.
The Information Commissioners Office guidance on using AI in recruitment recommends that the AI tools are regularly monitored so that action can be taken swiftly to address any fairness, accuracy or bias issues. Although recruiters may not always notice any bias in their AI input, it can be significantly amplified in the output, as the Workday example shows. The key is minimising this, acting on any discriminatory outputs swiftly through regular monitoring, and keeping relevant policies up to date to reflect the employer’s continuing commitment to equality and diversity.
The ICO requires recruiters to inform candidates about how their information will be processed and carry out comprehensive risk assessments. It also recommends that recruiters collect only the minimum possible information to achieve AI’s purpose.
Employers are continuously adapting to a new technological landscape, and although there are risks associated with the use of AI in areas such as recruitment, it can certainly prove to be a useful tool if operated carefully and with regular monitoring.
For more information and tailored advice on using AI, contact Tom Clarke.
Send us your query and we will be back in touch as soon as possible.
For the latest insights, updates and events join our mailing list
‘Hay & Kilner’ and ‘Hay & Kilner Law Firm’ are both trading names of Hay & Kilner LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with registered number OC418767. Our registered office is at The Lumen, St James' Boulevard, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5BZ and we are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (Authorisation number 643191). We use the word ‘partner’ to refer to a member of Hay & Kilner LLP. A list of the members is available at our registered office.